Recently, under the organization of South China Agricultural University and Southern Rural Newspaper, more than 30 guests from all over the country discussed and discussed the topic of urban-rural integration and grassroots governance in Nanzhuang Town, Foshan.
Professor Hu Wuxian, the host of the seminar of the South China Agricultural University, pointed out that China's urban-rural dual structure system has a long history, including institutional and economic reasons. Professor Hu invites experts to discuss the topic of urban-rural integration and local governance.
Associate Professor Liu Hui from the School of Public Administration of South China Agricultural University pointed out in the keynote speech entitled "On the Development of the Niche of Rural Schools" that rural schools, as an organism in the educational community, have more and more space and resources for their niche. Weakening and becoming more and more crowded, this weakening and squeezing will inevitably affect the function of rural schools, which in turn will affect the revitalization of the entire village. This requires a shift in the research paradigm of rural schools: ecological thinking based on the principle of integrity.The rural school niche includes three aspects: space, resources and function. From various statistics, the crisis in the rural school niche is becoming more and more serious. Expanding the niche of rural schools requires the formation of unique resources in rural schools, the release of internal motivation, the improvement of school operating mechanisms, the establishment of symbiosis between rural schools and urban schools, and the symbiotic relationship between rural schools and rural families. This may be the future of rural education in China. The inevitable choice of policy.
Associate Professor Gao Qinglian from the School of Public Administration of South China Agricultural University pointed out in the keynote speech entitled "Logical Deduction of Rural "Three Governances" and the Realization Mechanism of "Unity"", in the context of the new era, improving the efficiency of rural governance, integrating rural governance resources, and realizing The organic combination of traditional rural governance elements and modern rural governance elements needs to understand the internal tension between autonomy, the rule of law, and the rule of virtue, and the deductive logic of the three, and explore the realization mechanism of "three-in-one". The realization of the rule of virtue depends on several forces. First, the construction of family ethics is first; second, the moral consciousness of the people; third, the guidance and demonstration of moral values.
Professor Zhang Kaiyun of the School of Public Administration of South China Agricultural University in "Professional Leading, Diversified Linkage and Residents-Oriented: The Basic Dimension of Rural Community Governance Innovation--Taking "Beidouxing" Shunde Shishi Community Construction Project as an Example" The basic dimension is analyzed from three levels: the main level—professional leadership: in the current practice of rural community construction, professional power (social workers) has an important leading role and is the designer and integrator of community governance innovation. Target level - Resident-based: People in the community are the most important assets of the community and an indispensable force in the community. It can be said that the residents-oriented is the basic destination of community governance innovation. Mechanism level-multiple linkage: effective and sustainable community governance needs to have “leading power”, and it needs an effective linkage platform and method for multiple entities such as communities (neighborhood committees), enterprises and institutions under the jurisdiction, social organizations and residents. The architecture integrates and inclusives multiple forces to participate in community governance, and forms a governance model with clear positioning and benign interaction to achieve complementary advantages, seamless synergy and linkage.
Professor Tang Bin, South China Agricultural University pointed out in the keynote speech entitled "Building a Pilot Evaluation Mechanism to Promote Rural Revitalization and Development" that grassroots pilots are an important method for rural policy innovation and rural governance innovation. At present, there are over 10,000 rural pilot projects promoted by government departments at all levels in China, including five types: one is the national comprehensive supporting reform pilot zone with “three rural” as the main pilot content; the second is the comprehensive rural reform approved by many ministries and commissions. The pilot demonstration zone; the third is the national pilot project for individual rural reform approved by the central ministry; the fourth is the pilot project for comprehensive rural reform set up by the local government; and the fifth is the pilot project for rural reform set by the local government and functional departments. At present, the dilemma of China's rural reform pilot evaluation lies in: 1. The experimental characteristics affect the validity of the pilot evaluation; 2. The complexity of the rural reform pilot hinders the assessment operation; 3. The main limitations of the existing pilot evaluation model.For these questions, I put forward some suggestions for the construction of the normative mechanism for rural reform pilot evaluation: 1. Identify the objectives of the rural reform pilot evaluation; 2. Establish a scientific pilot evaluation index system; 3. Optimize the evaluation process of rural reform pilots; Strictly implement the responsibility of the pilot evaluation. At the same time, there are some problems that deserve further exploration: 1. How to balance the “local target” and “demonstration target” in the rural reform pilot? 2. How do you think about the failure of the pilot? For the pilot area, does the pilot failure correspond to accountability or benefit compensation?
Dr. Jiang Hongjun, Associate Professor of the School of Public Administration of Guangzhou University, said in the keynote speech entitled “Micro-corruption Governance in Precision Supervision and Embedded Poverty Alleviation——Based on the Experience of Guangdong Experience”, “micro-corruption” is in poverty alleviation and development activities. The corruption of some rural cadres involves a lesser abuse of public power and a lesser amount of corruption, but it is a major form of poverty alleviation. In the “micro-corruption” governance of precision supervision and embedded poverty alleviation, in terms of the governance mechanism of poverty alleviation “micro-corruption”, one is to sink from supervision (the institutionalization of national anti-corruption forces embedded in poor villages) and to improve the network (three-dimensional Network support poverty alleviation “micro-corruption governance” and information sharing (big data platform to resolve information asymmetry), the second is to start from the deep logic of poverty alleviation “micro-corruption” governance, so that the national anti-corruption forces can be embedded in poverty alleviation in the embedded poverty alleviation process. The village is to prevent “micro-corruption”.
Fu Yuhua, School of Political and Public Affairs Management of Sun Yat-Sen University, gave us a keynote speech entitled "Political-Family Cooperation under the Rural Co-governance Pattern", which discussed "based on a multi-agent perspective, building a joint and shared governance. Under the rural governance pattern, what governance practices are there?” “What kind of interaction does the state power governance force have with the clan governance power (“political-ethnic”)?” “What is the internal mechanism of 'political-ethnic’ revolving around the countryside? ?"The problem. Taking some villages in Jiaoling County of Meizhou as an example to study the mechanism of "political-family" cooperation under the co-governing pattern: homogeneity and heterogeneity, governance heterogeneity and homogeneity between different forces must be within a suitable measure "Seeking common ground while reserving differences", based on their respective advantages and consistent goals to achieve joint governance cooperation.
Shen Aijun of Wenzhou University stated in the keynote speech entitled “From “Let's Integrate” to “Resource Integration”: The Network Unified Warfare Paradigm Shift in Rural Revitalization”, in the context of the rural revitalization era, as a service to the national policy, mobilize everything The united front work of power should naturally serve the strategy of rural revitalization. In the work of united front, whether from the needs of rural rejuvenation or the characteristics of united front, the network opinion people who are the targets of network united front are more suitable to become the backbone of the current rural revitalization. Take Wenzhou as an example, the network social organization of Wenzhou Kenn University and the revitalization of rural culture: unite the network, strengthen the centripetal force among the network, let the rural culture catch the Internet + express; Wenzhou Network Public Welfare Association and the rural economic revitalization: Internet people can realize “one-on-one” online help and project self-service docking; “question for the people” and rural governance: throwing specific topics and mobilizing the enthusiasm of netizens to participate.
Yang Zhengxi, deputy dean of the School of Public Administration of South China Agricultural University, expressed his gratitude to the wisdom of the contributions from Sun Yat-Sen University, South China University of Technology, South China Agricultural University, Northeast Normal University, Northeast Agricultural University, Guangzhou University, and Sun Yat-Sen University. College, Guangzhou Engineering and Technology Vocational College, Wenzhou University, Foshan Municipal Party School and other college teachers and students conduct in-depth analysis on urban and rural integration and local governance, new era rural revitalization and other issues, and understand Guangdong villages for government departments, media, experts, scholars and graduate students at all levels. Revitalizing the reality, finding problems and actively seeking solutions provides a high-quality collision of ideas. In this summit forum, we not only learned the sharing of the top three agricultural scholars in China, but also listened to the voices from the government, and the experts and scholars attending the conference and the graduate students of the School of Public Administration of South China Agricultural University conducted a field study and study to observe the way to Nanzhuang. Further observe and explore how to move the rural revitalization road in the economically-developed areas and how to build a shared and governance-sharing pattern.
(By Liu Yanan)
